Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Joey Smith who wrote (44232)	12/29/1998 4:53:00 PM
From: Maxwell	Read Replies (1) of 1572207

Joey Smith: <<3D-NOW has been a complete failure for AMD. Why? Because AMD has not been able to charge a "value premium" for it.>> Are you stupid or what? You guage success as the ability of charging a "value premium" for new technology? I guage success as the ability of establishing a standard and bring value added to consumers. MMX was a complete failure because the technology didn't bring any value added to consumers. <<Have you seen the prices for K6-2 chips lately (relative to Intel chips)? Not a pretty picture.>> Why do you think this is so? Is it because 1) AMD yield of the 400MHz is less than 1%? 2) AMD supply limited? 3) AMD is demand limited? 4) AMD try to penetrate the market? 5) AMD is trying to establish a standard on 3DNOW? 6) AMD yield is bad? 7) AMD yield is good? Stick around for Q4 earnings and we will hear what AMD has to say. Maxwell

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next