SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (6391)12/29/1998 6:19:00 PM
From: FMK  Read Replies (1) of 27311
 
Zeev, I am surprised to see you stoop to misquoting me. I had a higher opinion of you than that. You just posted that I was estimating 3 lines of laptop production

YOUR WORDS>>FMK is claiming that each line will produce 8000 laptop batteries per day>>

Here is what I recently posted:

To: +MHS (5923 )
From: +FMK
Saturday, Dec 12 1998 4:05PM ET
Reply # of 6393

MHS, I think 30 mln shares is more accurate, but let's try 40 mln
on for size. How bad would such a doomsdayers scenareo hurt us?
Here's a modified set of estimates.

50% profits on 1mln cellphone batteries/mo from Hanil JV
---$20mln/40mln sh = ----------------------------$0.50/sh

100% profits on 1mln cellphone batt/mo by Valence on identical
Arcotronics line-----$40mln/40mln sh----------$1.00/sh

50% profits of additional production line from Hanil JV
-----------------------------------------------------$0.19/sh

90% profits on the army's $15,000 OICW (objective individual
combat weapon) that an Alliant Tech spokesman stated that
Valence will build batteries for, to replace the now-standard M16
rifle. No telling when govt will announce. These numbers are no
more than a wild guess.

Est 300,000 rifles x $200/batt x 33% profit = $19.8 mln/30mln
-----------------------------------------------------$0.38/sh

50% of other Alliant/Valence JV profits on Seal propulsion,
combat vest batteries etc.
very rough estimate 50% of
$30mln--------------------------------------------$0.38/sh

Possible laminate sales to GM Delphi automotive and royalties for
SLI (starting lights ignition) batteries replacing conventional
lead-acid batteries on certain GM models-----$0.22/sh

Possible laminate sales to GM Dephi for Vehicle propulsion
batteries------------------------------------------$0.22/sh

2.5 mln laptop batteries from line 1 at $75 each x 33%
profit/40mln--------------------------------------$1.56/sh

10 mln unnamed application batt at $6 each x 40% profit/40mln
----------------------------------------------------$0.50/sh

25,000 unnamed application batt at $1000 each x 33% 30mln
----------------------------------------------------$0.19/sh

Estimated total earnings at 40 mln sh dilution---$5.25/sh

Possible license agreements with such companies as Mitsubishi,
Sanyo, Sony or Matsushita etc. were not included. I have heard
estimates that revenue from license agreements could exceed
earnings from Valence's own production.

Some related links

exchange2000.com

exchange2000.com

exchange2000.com

exchange2000.com

Applying a multiple of 20 times earnings would indicate a $105
share price with a worst-case 40 million share dilution, with the
exception of license agreements, which could add significantly
earnings.

For me, it's more than enough to continue owning as many shares
as I can afford and reason to continue accumulating, especially in
the single digits. I continue to rate Valence's chance of failure at
less than 0.1 %

Another possibility not mentioned by the naysayers is that a portion
of these profits will likely be used to expand and buy more
equipment, reducing the earnings per share.

Of course, a fast growing company may deserve a PE of 30 or 40,
making earnings plowback a moot point in view of the effect on
share price.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
As you can see, I was estimating 2.5 million laptop batteries from line 1 and cellphone batteries for line 2.

IMO, lines 1 and 2 were not part of the refinancing and s3 statements about the "line" refers to line 3. The schedules for lines 1 and 2 should be unaffected by the financing.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext