Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (44326)	12/29/1998 9:20:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) of 1572416

Tenchusatsu, I was curious if they could both co-exist and thus make the transition easy. The processor would deal with whatever code it got, risc or x86, but be a lot faster with risc and the appsmakers would migrate to risc as they upgraded. I would be happy to see the x86 legacy apps be one with the dodos, like Apple did with their transitions, they pushed them off cliffs. Possibly Intel and MSFT saw this and became wiser/dumber/scared and so the x86 lumbered on. I see what you mean about blurring the line between risc/cisc as the optimal architecture is evolved with bits of both. Search for the holy grail comes to mind. That Microprocessor report looks like a good source, and I will try to hunt it up. Not likely to fully understand it though. Bill

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next