Robert is correct. He has as much a right to post the positives about this company as we all do to post the negatives, and to try and stop him from doing that is nothing short of the very thing we (I) have accused him of doing to us (me).
I think I am in a different position than many on this thread, in that my loss is not all that big compared to some. There are many here who cannot afford the luxury of dismissing all of this as a loss and moving on, as they have too much invested and simply must have this stock recover to avoid a catastrophic financial blow.
Unfortunately for them, it does not appear that this will happen thru the merit of the company. Therefore, it is my opinion that it would not be wise to invest in this company for the long term, but again, that is my opinion only, based on my own personal experience with this company. While I do not have the exact numbers, I'd bet that the vast majority of people who have invested for the long term in the past have lost money.
Since long term investing is basically out as an option, the only realistic alternative that many people have is to try to trade their way out of it by averaging down and trading based on momentum. Considering that Eutro is likely at rock-bottom now, it is possible for people to make some of their money back by doing this. It is probably an ideal time to buy it if one is planning on momentum trading it. As long as the person(s) are not making glowing posts about the company, claiming to be buying, hyping the stock, manipulating the trading, scalping, etc. while they are getting out, it is not an illegal practice. That is why they call it a market.
What should be remembered here is that it is the company and its insiders & friends, etc. that is responsible for your loss, not the other investors.
I agree, if we demand the right to post the negative facts, we must also allow the right to post the positive facts. Then people can make up their own minds based on the facts, we have a level playing field, and everybody has a fair shake. As long as it is factual, it belongs here, whether it is positive or negative.
Just my opinion,
Binder |
