I agree with Aleta. I would caution people against e-mailing the information requested to a hotmail address. We have no way of knowing that that is Pat Hayton's e-mail address.
As an alternative, people may wish to FAX to the same number, which I think we have reasonable reason to believe is Pat Hayton's FAX number. (Aleta's previous communication with him, including the capture of his voice number on caller ID, and the fact that I trust Aleta.) Or, get him to provide an e-mail address at ESVS or ZULU.
No, I did not receive any communication from Mr. Hayton. I did not leave him an e-mail address, but he has my FAX number.
If it IS Pat Hayton, it would seem to be a stalling tactic. Does he really expect people to send him their trade confirmations? Do blot-out your account numbers, people...
I have no intention of fowarding the information - it is irrelevant. I forwarded all of the questions that were asked on the threads, after spending the time to re-word them "in a gentlemanly manner" (they were NOT originally, and it isn't MY questions that weren't...).
The answers to these questions are OWED to the shareholders of these companies in any case, and it really should be done through official shareholder communication, rather than a personal answer.
I've made Pat aware of what questions were being asked on the threads. It's up to him to use that information as he pleases.
BTW, as for the request for "price paid". I think the reason for that request is the same reason why he meets personally with the more gullible shareholders. I think he gets some perverse pleasure in seeing just how far they will bend over, and how much they will beg for it...
So much for gentlemanly requests. :)
Oh, one more thing - I've got one more question. It's a private one just for Pat. (I know you're reading...) Pat, can you recommend a good limo service in L.A.? Thanks. |
