SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : DIAMONDWORKS DMW.v

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: trilobyte who wrote (150)12/30/1998 3:43:00 PM
From: Kevin Hamlin  Read Replies (2) of 413
 
Well I have to admit Octagon (house 64) is getting on my nerves a bit! After digging a little bit though on them, this "on my nerves" may be a little premature. Here's what I've found out so far.

1) They ONLY have a seat on the Toronto exchange....that's it. This makes me think that they may really be U.S. based, which would be important in this case because (so I understand) U.S. tax loss selling of Canadian securities may continue up and to tomorrow..... and then be over.

2) I've gone back over the trades by 64 for the past 2 years. They did about 320,000 shares worth of buying...no selling...during March, April, and May of this year...at an average costs of $1.29 (ouch!) Tax loss sell now?? I sure would be!! With the number of shares that they've sold (all in December by the way), they have got some more from somewhere other than the ones I've found so far. Still looking for the answer to this.

3) The buying continues through Cannacord though...quite large at times too. In total, while Octagon has sold close to 400,000 shares today, Cannacord has bought close to 350,000 shares.

Well we'll know in a couple of days whether the Octagon offers were U.S. based tax loss. I have my suspicions they are and will keep digging for more information. In the mean time, I still think DMW is a bargain at these prices!

Regards,

Kevin
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext