Amati vs Westell, DMT vs CAP ADSL Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amati vs Westell, DMT vs CAP ADSL

WSTL 6.190

+6.2%

11:40 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Steve Macica who wrote (1326)	1/23/1997 4:02:00 PM
From: Luke Smithwick	of 1365

Steve, << >> Examples: >> - There ARE variable bit rate CAP chips available today. Since when last week? >> Actually, since September 1996. . << >> - CAP requires a SMALLER interleaving depth than DMT. Do you realize what you are saying here? >> I do. Did you know that CAP does NOT REQUIRE FEQ to operate as does DMT (clipping in the AFE)? << So Luke, are you saying that CAP, with its SMALLER interleave depth, is more susceptible to impluse noise or is a lower bandwidth system (or both) than DMT systems?? >> Perhaps you should look at the draft document: ftp://mars.superlink.net/luke/capvdmt.ps then feel free to contact me... Luke

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next