Jon, here's how I liken your attitude. I'll use a baseball analogy. Tony Gwynn goes 0 for 4 in the seventh game of the season. So here we are near the All-Star Break and you're still telling people Tony Gwynn went 0 for 4. And all you can talk about is that Tony Gwynn went 0 for 4. Zulu could win the batting title in '99, but you'd still be talking about the day they hit like a bum! Whose the real bum in this?
You know, if one were to read your anti-Zulu postings, it'd be clear to them that you view Zulu as performing a tremendous harm on society. Well, personally, I think you've missed the boat if you're concerned about harms on society, particularly if you use a scale of competing harms.
You see, there so many needy and better causes or vehicle organizations which could use your energy. Next time you get the urge to post negatively about Zulu? Why not instead go help your local soup kitchen for homeless folks.
But, for some strange and unbeknownst reason, you'd rather waste your time picking on investors of a penny stock who know full well the risks they've taken prior to investing into such a penny stock. I know it's presumptuous of me, but: Jon, what a waste of intelligence on your part!
How about finally giving us an honest explanation as to why you expend your energy trashing Zulu and Pat Hayton. What are you up to now, 2000 negative posts, since the time of the Wired articles? Are you proud of this campaign you're on? Do you enjoy trying to scare investors away from what might become a lucrative investment?
I still think, since you and Hayton share the same geographical part of the country, that you're angry at him 'cause he grabbed the last hamburger deal on sale at your local supermarket. What else could explain your relentless negative pounding. I mean why treat people like hamburger, as you did with Cliff just 'cause he made an honest mistake.
Aren't you the guy who just yesterday posted your private message on the public thread? Haven't I also made that mistake? Were we "mis-leading" people, as you claimed Cliff was doing? Of course not, and neither was Cliff. You owe him an apology, not a lecture! |
