SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (6553)1/1/1999 5:47:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson  Read Replies (1) of 27311
 
Thanks Zeev, Thanks Larry for the concern both you non shareholders express in Valence.

Zeev your posts are full of thus this thus that, I wonder this, maybe we can assume that, if rational people can assume. Do you think Lev would have ordered additional production lines for Hanil and the lines in NI without out having future revenues and financing lined up?? Come on!!

I believe Lev has financing under control, I believe we are not far away from announcements, and that the markets view of Valence will swing to much higher levels of confidence. You continually conjure up conjecture knowing that no one can answer the rhetorical questions you present. You emphasize your intentions at the expense of thought. Levs financing and continuation plans have not been fully disclosed and you use SEC releases to present only one side of the story.

Someone pointed out your posts are not relevant because they can only lead to a dead end. I know you perceive yourself as a genius, we've seen your resume more than once. But Zeev, one cannot argue the numbers unless we know publicly Valences complete plan.

I totally view the risk as low. If you choose to base your opinions on balance sheets. Fine... Maybe you could tell us what the risks of being short in the stock are?

In regards to nuclear war, the insurance policy hasn't removed the clause about possible nuclear war from the disclaimer in the same way CC refers to the convertible preferred. It's just boilerplate language Zeev nothing more.

Mark

P.S. Zeev, There is no reason to honor me with a response my money's on table and I have conducted My own DD. I consider your involvement less than genuine!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News