>>Let me analyze your logic here, if I may. Because many things can kill a fetus, that means it is okay to destroy it intentionally with RU-486.
I hesitate to get into this, especially in defense of one of the shriller liberals on these threads, but I don't see how you can infer this "logic" at all. Michelle's original statement was:
>>There are tons of things that cause pregnancies NOT to come to term, such as smoking, alcohol etc and if these sanctimonious religious groups were truly concerned about this 10-hr old fertilized egg they would be picketing the tobacco companies
The clear intent of this statement is to say "There are many preventable things that kill fetuses, so if the life of the fetus is so important to some people, then these people should be fighting those things." It's unclear whether she means "in addition to..." [abortion, RU-486, etc.], or "instead of..." [abortion, RU-486, etc.]. Either way, there is absolutely nothing in her statement to support your (obviously biased) interpretation.
Besides, if you really want to pick a fight about abortion, you should probably go to (or create) a thread about the subject.
Kindly,
Bob Lao-Tse |
