SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: FawnVu who wrote (2294)1/2/1999 9:29:00 AM
From: Brooks Jackson  Read Replies (1) of 122087
 
Regarding libel suits -- a few pointers

(I'm not a lawyer, but as a journalist I deal with this every day)

1. You are NOT anonymous. Obviously Yahoo rolled over as soon as they got a subpoena and gave up the name of the poster. AOL did the same thing to that gay Navy guy a while back. And I have no doubt that SI would not make any effort to protect the identity of posters should they received a subpoena. So -- you ARE responsible for what you say.

2. In general, they can't hurt you for expressing your OPINION. It's a free country after all. They CAN collect damages if you state false and damaging FACTS. Opinion: "I think Johnny Hypster is a crook." Fact: "Johnny Hypster is a crook." Hypster might collect in court for the second statement, not for the first. Just keep putting "IMO" (In My Opinion) in every sentence.

3. Truth is still a defense. If you can prove at court that Johnny Hypster IS a crook, he can't collect. So -- accuracy, accuracy, accuracy! "According to an SEC press release dated Nov. 12 last year Johnny Hypster was convicted on 18 counts of securities fraud ... "
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext