Hmm, so you really believe that it is people talking about the questionable fundamentals of the company that cause the price to fall, and not the questionable fundamentals, right? I'm amazed how the shills always cry about the short sellers pointing out the inconsistencies of a company and blaming that. After all, if you just ignore the problems, they'll go away right? And there's nothing unethical at all about hyping worthless paper to risky levels and encouraging folks to buy, even with though you're only promoting this company on hopes and dreams. If only no one had pointed out that there was no gold, no one would have lost money on BXMNF.
It would be a hopelessly stupid strategy to pick a fundamentally sound company and post lies on ‘net chat boards hoping to scare folks out, when one can post the truth about garbage companies and wait for the inevitable correction to fair value. The truly greedy short fundamentally flawed companies like Osicom. The truly stupid explain fluctuations by making up fantasy conspiracy theories and blaming everything but the underlying company. After all, you'd have to admit that you could be wrong to admit that I could be right. So your explanation is that I know you're right and that the company is sound, and that rather than going long I'd post lies in order to scare folks out. Your theory makes no sense at all.
Barb
|
