SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cirruslvr who wrote (44594)1/3/1999 2:34:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) of 1571020
 
<Well, if all those companies choose processors because of a larger and faster L2 cache, AMD should have an easier time getting the K7, with up to 8MB L2 cache, in servers.>

Why does everyone think that the K7 is automatically going to have 8 MB of L2 cache in it? Don't people realize that the 8 MB L2 cache size was given as a theoretical maximum?

I don't think the K7 is going to get 8 MB of L2 cache any time soon, or even 2 MB for that matter. AMD might want to wait a year or two as the K7 platform matures and the processor speeds increase before going for 2 MB or more of L2 cache.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext