SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters"

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (1229)1/4/1999 9:22:00 PM
From: Peter O'Brien  Read Replies (1) of 2390
 
I thought private activity wasn't supposed to matter..., so why
are you criticizing Henry Hyde?

Was Henry Hyde ever accused of sexual harassment?

Was Henry Hyde ever asked to testify under oath?

In general, do you think the enforcement of sexual
harassment laws is important?

In general, do you agree with the Federal Rules of Evidence
which allow the plaintiff in a sexual harassment case to discover
a defendant's sexual history (even consensual history) with
others in the workplace?

And, just who do you think it was that signed the law
in 1994 which changed the Federal Rules of Evidence to favor
the plaintiff in such a discovery? (I know that 4 years ago
must seem like ancient history to certain people with very
short memories. It was back when the Democratic Party actually
thought that the enforcement of sexual harassment laws was
important.)

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext