3DFX Message Board - Msg: 7109232

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3DFX

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Obewon who wrote (9980)	1/5/1999 2:20:00 AM
From: Patrick Grinsell	Read Replies (3) of 16960

As much as we can say now that Voodoo3 will be successful, it doesn't mean anything if 3Dfx can't deliver want the OEMs want. Already the industry is grumbling about the lack of 32bit color and z-buffering. The industry? You mean game developers right? They've been baggin' ATI for years to no effect. This argument doesn't hold water. As OEMs can put 32 bit in their spec sheet (which they can), they don't care. ATI has excelled at giving the OEMs what they want when they want it in the quantities desired for a low price. Bingo. Given the boxmakers "give a crap" attitude about 3d other than price/benchmark performance levels I think we can expect OEMs to care less about 32bit 3d rendering and more about reliablity. If OEMs were as technology sensative as you make them out to be, ATI would be bankrupt... ATI's success speaks volumes about what kind of products OEMs are looking for and, IMHO, 3dfx should not waste a dollar more for something OEMs care nothing about. The added cost may make the difference between a deal won or lost. Contrary to popular belief, the TNT has had nowhere near the OEM penetration levels of the Riva128. I think there is a reason for this and I would welcome all comments as to why this is the case. Pat

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next