Micron Only Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum

MU 207.36

+3.0%

Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (41877)	1/5/1999 10:08:00 AM
From: SlowThinker	Read Replies (1) of 53903

Are you sure that the numbers you quoted were from the same analyst as I quoted, or are you saying that every the opinion of every analyst is suspect? (more than usual, anyway) Regardsless, guess we'll find out over the next few months what the market thinks the valuation of the stock should be. Re: your thoughts on perjury, current public opinion in America is vastly at odds with your statement that prior perjury is relevant. ;-) Regards, >>Pulling numbers out that an analyst may have come out with 3 years ago isn't particularly directly relevant to the conversation at hand, is it?<< >it absolutely is. it goes to credibility. is a prior perjury relevant when someone is testifying against you in court? heck yeah... that is one example. everyone was wrong about 1996. everyone was wrong about 1997. everyone was wrong about 1998. the analysts were always high b/c their methodology was always wrong.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next