International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: CynicalTruth who wrote (1659)	1/24/1997 7:18:00 PM
From: Bob Jagow	of 35569

Talking about the 2/23 warrants, John? Hope we have news by then! Re the gap, hope it persists for at least a year or two. <g> A question for you re the warrants; why do we hope the price will be in this range or higher in order to assure their exercise? Seems to me $3+ would attract them all, and the co gets $2.83 or whatever in any case. Saw the same situation WRT a cheap oil I own; was argued there that have to keep the holders happy for the next time money is wanted. I took this to mean that the original holders want to make a bundle upon exercise. Clearly some who later bought the warrants could lose. -bob

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next