I can't say I don't....
Besides, not only do I agree with him in most of what he wrote, I like his feisty spirit & wit. His ability to laugh at pre-established wisdom is unique.
He hated what I have always hated, government, religion, and unquestioned (undeserved), authority, he, he, he, (read bureaucrats).... what can I say. He also had a few comments about the educational system.
Another unique characteristic of his was that in spite of his legendary caution against marriage, to which he himself, eventually succumbed, he gave due recognition to women. Indeed, in many areas he clearly conceded that women are far superior than men.
He did not like FDR, he understood the value of the US Bill of Rights, he viewed life in a simplistic manner were honesty, common sense and decency had more value than any god, altar, or Congress could add to one's life.
Very similar views to those of Ayn Rand. These two writers could see through the lies of politicians and had the ability to clearly consider other possibilities in terms of government. Ayn Rand seemed more passionate about her beliefs, Mencken seemed to me more practical, but both of them very accurate. In my eyes, these two were born too early, I would love to see Mencken and Rand comment on the current Circus of the Absurd that Washington DC has become.
In a way, since Alan Greenspan is the Fed chief, (and ex-Rand contributor), we can see a clear statement of the current events. Meaning, the capital markets do pay attention to Greenspan and Rubin, whereas they totally ignore the bozos of government.
Every time I read both of these authors it feels correct and accurate, and on top of that in Mencken's case, he makes me laugh.
So yes, I guess I do like him a lot. And in order to stay "on topic" here is one more from "my bible"
_______________________
"...history deals mainly with captains and kings, gods and prophets, exploiters and despoilers, not with useful men."
~ H L Mencken. |
