SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Thread Morons

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (6492)1/6/1999 12:45:00 AM
From: X Y Zebra  Read Replies (1) of 12810
 
Neo-physics is your theory, and it falls under the Neo-phyte category.

However, the Dark Suckers studies, and the related Mother Suckers, (aka Dark Holes), are clearly within the field of Nuclear Astrology, as such it requires a deep study of the stars, (including the forces of evil), in order to make relevant determinations.

Now, as for the emit-suck dilemma, once you accept that the absence of light is dark, and, further that light emits rays, then the clear conclusion is the opposite of emission, which it is suction.

In fact, dark being faster than light supports the hypothesis that dark suckers do suck and can not emit.... And visceversa.

There. So much for Neo-Physics.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext