FLYR, as one of the 5 biggest companies dealing with travels in the US should be known, no ? But let's assume it is not the case.
FLYR already has published results, published acquisitions, etc...
I agree 100% that FLYR is a good company, with growing revenues, strong numbers, and an anounced internet strategy. These are public informations.
More, they have positive ratings from brokers.
What else could they bring on the table to be even more attractive ?
I think that a major negative point, that takes them appart from hype is their lack of commitment on internet related sales. They count on internet for only a few % of their revenues, where their counterparts forecast huge numbers and dedicate their entire growth on this media. This allow these companies to reach a much bigger audience than those with offices acquired throughout the country.
This makes them appear more attractive because despite their poor numbers, investors can dream about their future. Of course, this is not rational, but are all investors ? |
