Randmiser, I think it's obvious JT has a personal vendetta against Pat Hayton and thus Zulu. The only reason, to date, since his first appearance at the time of the Wired articles, JT has provided us for his continued presence on SI/ZULU is that he's here for educational reasons, and an interested observer.
Kayak, by the way, holds a similar self-professed position over on the Yahoo board. And there's a few others of this ilk as well. Together, they form what I call the wolfpack.
Of the thousands of stocks JT could choose involvement with, why has he picked one he'll never invest in (according to his own remarks) and why has he continually hammered away at one individual, Pat Hayton? Obviously, it's gotta be a personal vendetta. What else could it possibly be? And worse, he veils this ill-intent vendetta professorarially by suporting his remarks with his technical and market knowledge.
Now, when I criticize JT he knows exactly where my criticism comes from and why I'm doing it. Why can't he, when blasting Pat Hayton or Zulu, show the same standard. Why you doing it, JT? In my opinion, your technical and market knowledge talents are wasted here. But it's your choice and there's absolutely nothing I can do about it, except to continue to lodge my own criticism for your actions.
Indeed, his views concerning Pat Hayton, Zulu in General, are well tainted, extremely unfair and of the worst prejudicial order. I'm, frankly, surprised JT has taken this personal animosity so far, showing no consideration at all on how his negative blasts can and do impact the innocent and well-intentioned present or potential investor in Zulu.
Of course, this question comes up month after month and still he provides no viable explanation for his presence. Sure, he'll give the same quick-skip answer, but based on the pattern of his writing it certainly can't be construed as a real answer. And, needless to say, this is disappointing. |
