In a sexual harrassment case, it is common practice to bring as evidence a pattern of sexual behavior on the part of the accused which would substantiate the allegations of the accuser.
Yeah...I love this...especially since it was Clinton himself who signed into law a provision allowing the complete invasion of one's privacy; including going into their trash, computer files, phone records, book and magazine purchases, and their mail; to build a case of sexual harassment behavior over time. Clinton hasn't endured nearly the scrutiny the average citizen would have if accused of sexual harassment.
"And it was the Republicans that started it."
Another lie. Wasn't it Barbara Boxer who revealed, just a few days before the election, that Bruce Hershensohn(no self righteous Bible thumper he) once went to a strip bar for lunch? This was one time! He didn't grope, fondle, or ask for a BJ. Bruce, a true intellectual, has never stooped to the gutter the way Boxer and the Dems do every day. A big success for the Dems though since the experience so disgusted Bruce he decided to never run again.
Wasn't it the militant feminists who attacked Justice Thomas for allegedly using a few 'dirty words' in the workplace with a subordinate? Didn't they also, to support their case he was a sexual deviant, reveal he had, horrors, pictures of Playboy centerfolds hung up in his apartment? My God! Pornography! No, he didn't have redeemingly artsy nudes ala Hustler hung up in his apartment, it was the disgustingly exploitative photos from Playboy. One just knew he was going to sexually assault Anita Hill any day.
And now Livingston and Barr, who never attacked Clinton for his sexual indiscretions, only his lying about it in depriving Paula Jones her due process. At least it didn't take some sort of coercion to get Barr to step up to the plate and assume responsibility for fathering a child-he did it long before the sexual McCarthyism practices of the Dems came to the fore. |
