BNEZ and PMA; Success in 1999 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : BNEZ and PMA; Success in 1999

BNEZ 0.00

Sep 18 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: BigDaddyMac who wrote (1437)	1/7/1999 6:16:00 PM
From: Elio Madama	Read Replies (1) of 2648

Mitchell, once more to make clear. Did we have a naked position with BNEZ? Did that illegal position was 2.500.000 shares? Did BNEZ issued 2.500.000 shares to help MM's to cover such position? Do MM's have now all the shares they need to send out the certificates? and even more? Is AOL fault? jajajajajajajajaja. Is Elio fault? jajajajajajajajaja. Is Mitchell fault? jajajajajajaja. Name to me any other company with 2.500.000 shares (float), an Investor buying 500.000 shares and the price going down? JUST ONE. BNEZ and only BNEZ. Mitchell, it does not matter how much you try to scare me. It won't work. We have many thing which could be legal, but we also have many which could be not legal. If BNEZ was able to take to Court AOL, what make you think few shareholders can not take BNEZ to Court also? What you don't know is about ALL THE PEOPLE WHO PM TO ME AND WANT A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST BNEZ. Elio

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next