International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bob Jagow who wrote (1660)	1/26/1997 2:10:00 PM
From: CynicalTruth	of 35569

Far as I'm concerned, I don't care if that gap ever gets filled <G>. re: Warrants. Seems to me that as long as they are in the money they should all get exercised. But who knows. The higher they are the more reward for hanging on. One possible outcome would be profit taking after their exercise bringing the price down. I think we saw that happen with the Nov.(?) warrants. Price increased $1 share toward the end of Nov. then a couple of weeks later dropped back to where it started. With some well received news price might stay up. And if released a couple of weeks before exercise date could lock in some nice profit for the warrant holders. All my Ma indicators look great...headed up on a 15 degree trend line angle off the lows.....Where's the news <G>. John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next