SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Telebras (TBH) & Brazil
TBH 0.945-1.1%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: David Petty who wrote (11332)1/8/1999 11:00:00 PM
From: Fernando Saldanha  Read Replies (2) of 22640
 
This problem with Itamar Franco perhaps turned the attention of investors away from more serious matters.

The Central Bank's reserves have fallen to $34.5 billion. This is below the trajectory agreed with the IMF. The agreement stipulated that if reserves would fall below a specified trajectory the Central Bank's ability to sterilize the loss of reserves would be gradually restricted. Beyond a certain point, the Central Bank would be altogether prevented from sterilizing, and would for all practical purposes be functioning as a currency board.

In plain English, this means if reserves fall much more the monetary base will contract and interest rates will go up sharply. That would force a devaluation (or, less likely, capital controls).

One could ask why did the IMF include such restrictions in the agreement? The reason is probably that they did not want the Central Bank to keep sterilizing reserve losses, i.e., financing capital flight by pumping money into the economy, like the Russians did (the Russians skipped several auctions before their devaluation).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext