Re: Proving the ineffectiveness of Reticulose
<<In all fairness, what other "independant" sources can you tell us here that prove Reticulose ineffective?>>
The problem here is that before a "drug" is put on the market, it has to be proven effective, not the other way around. Otherwise, I could put "Jeff's Wonder Drug" on the market and then say "prove me wrong".
<<If you don't make these sources available I can only assume you are just as misleading and dishonest as any positive hypster.>>
Are you asking me to conduct my own double blind studies? Are you saying that because I have not found, nor have you provided, a single credible research project that, by saying so, I am being dishonest? Yikes!!!
There is a reason why we have the FDA: to make sure the DRUG COMPANIES prove the efficacy of their products, NOT us, the consumers.
I read from the "other" thread that Reticulose is now thought to be effective against a few more diseases, such as hepatitis. Next thing you know, it will cure baldness.
You want some advice? Do you really want to make money off this dog? Seriously? Make shampoo or skin cream using Reticulose. If it is perfectly legal to rub fennel, aloe, hops, mint, mistletoe, matricaria, yarrow, animal protein, etc. on our hair/skin, why not Reticulose? Sell it for $30 a bottle and, voila, big seller! You heard it here first.
- Jeff |
