SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum
MU 237.94-0.2%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (42118)1/10/1999 10:42:00 PM
From: PAinvestor  Read Replies (2) of 53903
 
Yes Fred, you are on the right track. Intel is attempting to persuade the chip manufacturers to move volume production over to Direct-RDRAM but there is a reluctance due to the cost involved (especially test). Further, chip makers believe that demand for Direct-RDRAM will remain only on higher end servers & PCs for some time. Effectively, a niche - profitable, but not large enough to justify the costs of retooling. As a result, it is in their interests to reap scale benefits by continuing to supply SDRAM (PC-100/133, DDR) for the bulk of the PC market - especially considering the sunk cost. I do not, therefore, think that RDRAM will "soon" become mainstream, though eventually it probably will. Don't misunderstand me, the top makers (Toshiba, NEC, Samsung, MU) are all capable of mass-producing RDRAM, but as long as it generates a profit for them. Of that, they are yet to be persuaded. Think of it more as temporary disagreement on strategic direction.

The industry will find it increasingly difficult to supply ANY high end DRAM in sufficient quantities, let alone Rambus. I believe Intel realizes this too.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext