SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Petz who wrote (45429)1/11/1999 2:10:00 AM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (2) of 1572371
 
Re: "OK, lets say depreciation was $1000 per wafer, labor was $400 per wafer and materials were $200 per wafer. Of Intel's $780M of depreciation, most is depreciation of semiconductor fab equipment, lets say, $500M. To cause $500M of depreciation, at $1,000 per wafer, Intel had to process 500,000 wafers. Intel produced 26M CPU's with 500,000 wafers. Thats 52 CPU's per wafer.

Intel sucks. "

John, I am not a finance person so I can't present the numbers to you, however I get my information from people I respect and have every reason to believe they do know what they are talking about. I'm sorry I can't convince you with facts, I don't have them to present and unlike others I will not try to defend what I can't prove. As confident as I am, I can't prove my claims. Believe what you want.

EP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext