SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maintenance who wrote (11606)1/11/1999 9:58:00 PM
From: teevee  Read Replies (2) of 26850
 
Hi maintenance,

<<<After considering the cone sheet theory you first brought to this thread I found it quite plausible. But the way you shoot down people who have a bearish opinion, or the way you keep raising your estimate of Winspears resource has me wondering what your up to. I think the concerns raise by Kaiser are worth investigating. If the CF results are comparable to the prior results will that increase the likelyhood that the three stones were not a fluke? Do you buy the story that Winspear is hiding the result from the public so as to keep Debeers in the dark? >>>>

First of all, I am only presenting my opinion and sharing some of my knowledge and experience. I'm not asking anyone to accept it. This is an open forum isn't it? Second, I don't shoot down people with a bearish opinion-only those who take cheap shots or have closed minds. From time to time I have tried to correct misleading comments or questions(commonly bearish) and if possible try to do so in some sort of context. Third, all I'm up to is challenging the "sneaks and snakes". Fourth, IMO, I will go on record again and say the CF results will be comparable( I base this on prior CF results in older NR's in the context of the geological setting and petrology). Fifth, I am satisfied the three largest stones, and the other eighteen diamonds above 1 carat in size are not a fluke. Yes, Winspear is deliberately keeping the size distribution confidential and for very good reason. IMO, it is because they don't want the company to be had too cheaply. If Snap Lake lives up to its expectations, it really and truly will be a threat to a good chunk of De Beers business. IMO, opportunities to participate in situations like this one don't come by very often, and when they do, I am not at all shy about stepping up to the plate. If any of you got shook out on Arequipa or Diamond Fields or Diamet, don't let it happen to you on this one. The more money on the table, the rougher the ride, and it hasn't even started yet...
regards,
teevee
PS: I am long WSP as I can be and am a bull.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext