SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: greenspirit who wrote (16420)1/11/1999 11:22:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (1) of 71178
 
Where I went to school we were not graded on a curve. Sometimes the whole class did great. Sometimes we all suuuucked.
When I went to college, I found out about grading on a curve. Let's say I was taken aback. (Then I totally dug it - because it stacked the deck in my favor.) The practice strikes me as corrupt - there is no way to REALLY tell the masters from the wannabees.
I have mixed feelings about the SAT. On the one hand - it's not a curve. Your score reflects how much you were able to answer correctly. (Not how much you know. I talked to a lot of folks who knew the material but choked in the test hall. This is part of it: performance under pressure. Real life, baby.)
On the other hand - the test can be tweaked without cheating. I took the PSAT "cold" and I stunk. I had never seen the format before. So for the SAT I bought one of those thick paperback "SAT Prep" guides and for a week I LIVED it. I became familiar with the format. I did quite well in the SAT - once I knew the peculiar idiom or syntax of the test.

I favor grades given on percent scored. I do not like "correcting" for how the group did. THe relative scores already will tell you who's best. But the absolute score will contain a piece of info lost on a curve.
Who is actually good.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext