SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Solv Ex (SOLVD)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mama Bear who wrote (6202)1/12/1999 3:38:00 PM
From: mqmsi  Read Replies (2) of 6735
 
Dear MAMA BEAR,

From my understanding, Yetter and Warden are taking the case on a contingency basis, it is not a ridiculous assertion as you state. The money raised that will go to Yetter and Warden from the $807,000 is simply to pay expenses (such as travel) involved in order to do the litigation. The attorneys will collect nothing (except incidental expenses) unless they win the case. I think it is ridiculous to assert that a law firm with this reputation would take on a frivolous suit as you say for $807,000. I realize that this is probably hard for you to believe, but not all people will sell their souls for money.

Mark
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News