Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill who wrote (27452)	1/12/1999 5:13:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) of 67261

A bit selective in standing by your words, I see. Not exactly a surprise. www2.techstocks.com To: Bill Grant (27254 ) From: Bill Vaughn Tuesday, Jan 12 1999 12:20PM ET Reply # of 27458 Not to mention that polls give Gore only 45% against either of the two Rep frontrunners. www2.techstocks.com To: Bill Vaughn (27255 ) From: Charles Hughes Tuesday, Jan 12 1999 3:39PM ET Reply # of 27457 << Not to mention that polls give Gore only 45% against either of the two Rep frontrunners. >> Who would those frontrunners be, and where can this poll be read? When did it occur? www2.techstocks.com To: Charles Hughes (27401 ) From: Bill Vaughn Tuesday, Jan 12 1999 4:01PM ET Reply # of 27457 There have been several polls that show both Bush and Pataki beating Gore easily. The problem isn't that I can't read, it's that you can't stand by your own words. Is Pataki a front runner or not? If not, what was the point of the last post above? We'll leave aside the unattributed nature of these "several polls" for the moment. Maybe it had to do with Leno's ratings, eh?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next