SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 124.11-13.6%Jan 30 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: heraclitus who wrote (26036)1/12/1999 6:46:00 PM
From: John D. McClure  Read Replies (1) of 116947
 
Hey Homer,

After perusing the draft Y2K Contingency Plan on the NRC website-specifically the section on regulatory response, which do you think would be the most risky: bending the rules to let these plants run (The NRC evidently felt it would cause more harm by shutting them down than to risk Y2K-related problems by letting them run.), or shutting them down in advance?

I have read in several different places that it takes around four months to properly shut down a nuke plant-but at least one thread warrior takes great issue with that info. Whether you shut the damn things down in September or November, that is 20% of our capacity-which evidently we can't do easily without (Well, maybe California could since they have all that hydropower).

By the way, I am beginning to warm to the idea that the fabled "they" have somehow hit on a reliable way to manipulate the gold market via derivatives. It is eerie that it is so range-bound despite (insert crisis here). I have been buying physical silver in small quantities mostly Eagles and junk silver-however I did pick up some 1/10 ounce Gold Eagles just for diversification. I think the Silver Eagles are the most beautiful silver coin today.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext