Winspear Resources Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: .Trev who wrote (11720)	1/12/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: teevee	Read Replies (3) of 26850

Hi trev, I see Bishop is back at it too. Just for fun, I am going to try and "peel the onion" by asking some questions?. 1. Is the timing of Bishop's release immediately after Kaiser's just a coincidence? Probably. 2. Both of these guys have reputations as having very big egos. Could they be trying to send a message to junior resource companies? Do things our way and make sure we are included (inside info and participation in cheap paper) or we will ruin your market and erase your from our universe...hmmmm... I don't think so. 3. Many people on this thread who have or do subscribe, summarize the recent track records of Bishop and Kaiser as poor at best. Bishop says sell Winspear, but buy Aber just in case Snap Lake is real, and Kaiser says sell 25% because the stock could go to $10 or $15 per share. I am having a hard time with the logic here. Is there a deliberate effort to knock the share price down? I don't think so. 4. Aber is putting up their 32% share of a $12 million dollar budget (~$3.8 million) for Snap Lake. Is this because they see limited tonnage potential, and a low probability of repeating the results to date? I don't think so. 5. The volume has been consistently high for the past few months. Winspear seems to be consistently bought at higher and higher prices and often on the offer. Is this the trading pattern of an over blown stock promotion? I don't think so. 6. Did Winspear people take down 2.7 million units because they see limited tonnage potential and high risks with respect to repeating results to date? I don't think so. 7. Who would have an interest in keeping the share price low? It isn't me. I can't imagine it could be any other shareholder. It must be someone who isn't as shareholder or maybe someone who, might have an interest in owning the whole company. Could seeds of doubt have been planted in Bishop and Kaiser by another diamond company-DeBeers perhaps? Could Kaiser and Bishop be unwitting patsies? Could they have been duped? I don't know and I don't think so. Hmmmmmm I guess I'm just going to have to wait for the bulk sample results. teevee

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next