Winspear Resources Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Taz who wrote ()	1/13/1999 12:17:00 PM
From: ddl	Read Replies (1) of 26850

Skeuze me, my English must be getting prety bad, but what does this really mean to you guys? Kaiser "In the absence of any evidence that the existence of these high value stones in a 199.7 tonne sample is representative of the diamond value distribution in a much larger kimberlite resource," To me this says that WSP has something but must now prove it further, right? Continues "we have to be very concerned that the average rock value of the Snap Lake kimberlite system WILL drop substantially when Winspear receives the results next summer for a 6,000 tonne bulk sample" This says to me that proving it is NOT required, as I KNOW that the next samples will be bad. He must chewing that cryptonite also.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next