Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (27705)	1/13/1999 6:26:00 PM
From: alan w	Read Replies (2) of 67261

The only thing I want is an honest portrayal from the left of one of Clinton's actions. Did Clinton say that we must stop digging dirt on each other? Is he now attempting to abide by that statement? As far as my "betting" that they correspond on a daily basis, that is obviously something I can't prove, so I take it back. I don't take back the Flynt interview. If there were no correspondence, Flynt would have flatly denied it then in my opinion. The "lot longer run" you talk about came about because Clinton thought he could deny everything and it would go away. When he was cornered, he had to admit to "improper activity". At that point Carville again went on the attack. There is no innuendo in the fact that Clinton said one thing and is now doing another. alan w

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next