Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Les H who wrote (27859)	1/14/1999 10:45:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) of 67261

A Jury Not of Peers but of Kin, Foe and Talking Head nytimes.com Been there, done that, Les, see Message 7260487. Cuts both ways. Precisely how many Republican Senators are going into this with an open mind? Exactly how many Senators would be left if you removed everybody that didn't have some bias going in? When I was promoting my modest proposal before the Nov. election, that candidates be upfront about where they stand on the issue, my fallback position, given the "unknowability" of how anyone might vote, was that in lieu of an honest statement, assume party affiliation as a fallback indicator. Party affiliation was a pretty good indicator in the House, and it will probably be a good indicator in the Senate too. Appropriately, when it's all politics, although it's unusual for Democrats to maintain very much party discipline. Glad to see you referring to the favored "objective" press source around here, though. Maybe local hero Drudge has been leaked something on the matter too.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next