Michael,
Thanks for at least giving credit for the "factual information", which it is. :)
As far as the "paranoia", I guess that you have to know what I know in order to properly judge whether there is basis in fact.
Good ploy with the "short" accusations, though. It's the internet way of discussing stocks, isn't it? If someone disagrees with you, they must be a "short".
I agree with you that it is generally not the proper thing to shoot at the company in which you are invested. However, I, and many others, are so long in this stock that we are down tens of thousands at this price range. The only hope we have of recovering some of our losses is if this stock moves significantly higher. I don't believe it can do so without substance in their business plan. That's why I attack "hype". It isn't going to get us very far.
Besides, logically, at .50 there's a lot bigger upside than down, don't you agree.
Regards,
AD |
