SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jlallen who wrote (28007)1/14/1999 8:14:00 PM
From: DEWWY  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
..."Starr did his job competently and thoroughly"..give me a break!
Can you explain, for example, why Starr has, in a supposed quest for truth, never actually met with his key witness Monica Lewinsky (I mean a one-on-one personal talk). As the appointed prosecutor, the least I would expect of this man would be to be sufficiently involved to meet himself with his key witness! (and all the others too!)

I find it strangely ironic, in contrast, that the key issue right now before the Senate, as is clearly being pushed by hard right Republicans, is the necessity of direct witness contact (particularly Lewinsky)..... "BECAUSE OF THE IMMEDIATENESS IT AFFORDED IN GETTING AT THE TRUTH".

Starr certainly did not feel the importance of the "immediateness" of such contact. It's very difficult to fathom this dichotomy...it does not depict, on the part of the lead prosecutor, a thorough approach to developing a convincing case and certainly is not competent.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News