Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (28044)	1/14/1999 10:11:00 PM
From: Peter O'Brien	Read Replies (1) of 67261

If you really think that Bill Clinton's predicament is unique, then you are living in a dream world... thelaborletter.com Here's an example of an article (dated February 1997, well before we ever heard the name "Monica") describing the legal strategy of naming an individual executive to intimidate him and force a settlement. In the article, the strategy is likened to "terrorism". We never heard the Democrats complaining about this situation before! As I mentioned earlier, Clinton signed the law which enabled this! The diehard feminists cheered! I can't speak to your individual situation without knowing more about it. Perhaps it was before 1994 (i.e., before Clinton himself removed some of the defendant's legal protections)? My point is, this strict interpretation that you complain so loudly about (now that your hero Bill Clinton is caught up in it), was not invented by Starr or the Republicans.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next