SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The SJI Group, Inc. (SJIG)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bob Davis who wrote (37)1/15/1999 8:57:00 AM
From: Francois Goelo  Read Replies (2) of 217
 
To: Bob Davis
From: Francois Goelo

REF: SJIG & SLEU, thanks for your prompt reply Bob.
Actually, I spent $200.00 for life membership, since the site is very informative from an investment point of view and that option is great value.
1) I make no claim whatsoever: I am just reporting on a phone conversation I had with J.D Jenkins for the purpose of attracting comments from people who might know something different to what I was told. Have you ever taken the time to talk to this guy?
2) It makes sense to post on the SLEU board because SJIG is a major share holder in SLEU and there is a potential advantage in buying SJIG shares for someone wanting to invest in SLEU, as John Rideout clearly explained in his post: "CAVEAT EMPTOR"
3) I had the same feeling that you have towards SJIG and FSS and that is why it took me so long to take the plunge. The deciding factor was SJIG substantial holding in SLEU and the fact that, if assets, excluding SLEU shares, really exceed liabilities, then SJIG is worth much more than .72. During the 13 minutes phone call yesterday, Jenkins sounded genuine: I assumed he told the truth and bought the shares.
4) I suggest you call him and ask him to confirm what I have reported, so that, if he lied, we have independent confirmation of it. I am just as interested as you are to get to the bottom of this matter.
Best regards,
F. Goelo
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext