Shalom,
Again, with all due respect, that entire post is ludicrous double speak.
<<t is better for you to comment on your own spirtuality and beliefs, which you can make authoritative statements, than it is to comment on that which it is impossible for you to know>>
<<What is impossible Mark, is for you to know what it is that I know.!>>
If you wish to claim to know more about my own beliefs or a particular authors beliefs, than I or the author do, go right ahead. It is a riduculous statement, but go for it.
<<Again, you are not in position to gauge anyone's sincerity, other than your own. >>
You can make assumptions about someones sincerity, you can choose to believe or not to believe it, but you can not guage or know for sure the reality of that sincerity. especially as it pertains to a particular book, which you have never read. Or as it pertains to the author of the same book.
Shalom, try to bully someone else. I don't care about your attempts to draw me into a meaningless argument.
mark |
