SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc.
DELL 119.89-2.3%3:46 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (89443)1/15/1999 1:36:00 PM
From: JRI  Read Replies (5) of 176387
 
Don't know if you are watching CNBC....they are showing a speech & Q&A with Abbey Joseph Cohen and SF Fed Gov..

Abbey raised some interesting points:

(1) U.S. banks have somewhere between 1/5 to 1/10 the exposure to Brazil in comparison to 5 years ago

(2) In her opinion, and the opinion of the SF Fed governor, the Brazil "crisis", in its current state, is a minor occurence (for the US), nothing more

(3) Stocks prices have increased over the past few years because their EVA has increased....the value of output- the cost of inputs (capital)...EVA...has increased over the last few years for many U.S. corporations......The current bull run (1990's) actually started with the corporate restructings which took place at the end of the 1980's/early 1990's when corporations ended tying up capital (and labor) in low-return opportunities ("restructuring")...since 1993..we have seen phase two, the reallocation of this capital (and labor) to higher-growth (return) opportunities..hence, the large of no. of new job created over the past 6 years, etc...Abbey noted, that Japan has actually had a negative EVA over the past few years...the problem has not been low cost of inputs (capital) or liquidity....rather, it has been the allocation of this (ample) capital to low or negative return ventures (ARE YOU LISTENING LUCRETIUS! GET A CLUE!)

and perhaps the most intriguing point(s)..

(3) Exports only comprise 13% of total GNP...so, when looking at the US economy, and thus US corporate profits, and thus stock prices, internal demand is considered much more important (than exports)...internal demand is really the key...and that appears to remain strong (looking forward) for Cohen and the gov.

(4) Because of the nature of U.S. exports have changed in the last decade, ie., technology, as a share of exports, have risen to 3 times the (%) level of the U.S. total exports as before (in only the last 7 years)...we have seen a dramatic shift from U.S. exports formerly consisting (primarily) of commodities and low-value added items......to, now, a much larger share consisting of high-tech exports...This is important, because Abbey clarifies that high-tech exports are (much more) immune to changes in exchange rates (than commodity exports)...ie., small/moderate changes in exchange rates become mostly irrelevant, and large changed muted...This explains Abbey's continuous bullish call over the last two years -despite the past (recent) crises of the last couple years...To repeat:Because of the "insensitivity" (of demand) of high-value added exports, making less relevent the less-favorable exchange rates with those economies (Asia, LA) experiencing trouble over the last couple years....and strong internal demand for goods and services...
Stock market prices have continued to go higher....

Note: Abbey estimates that high-tech exports are around 1/4 as sensitive to changes in exchange rates as commodity or low-value added exports...

The future: Cohen's (and the Fed governor's forecast) for 1999 and 2000 for the U.S economy....more of the same (including low interest rates)!

**Sorry for any run-on sentences all**

Now, go take your cat nap now <gg> You still have a lot of lives left...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext