Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (28205)	1/15/1999 3:38:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) of 67261

Madam, it is really quite a foolish thing to look to pornographers as arbiters of right and wrong. If a murder has occurred and if Barr was an accessory in that murder, I should trust the determination of our judicial system before I should trust a porno pimp and a woman who whores herself out to him. The circumstances here are certainly not as clear as you attempt to make them, and they are by no means as obvious as those surrounding Bill Clinton. >Are you saying that the "source" matters to you regarding any heinous crime?< Well of course the source matters. Liberals were hot to lynch Clarence Thomas on the mere word of Anita Hill, and yet despite the virtual century long record of philandering on the part of Bill Clinton are even now wont to reject the claims of Paula "trailer trash" Jones. We simply do not know the circumstances of the Barr situation. All we have heard are statements purchased by whoremoney. I cannot via principle assault Barr on the filthy word of Larry Flynt and his whore. Believe me. I have no allegiance to Barr whatever, and were I to believe him guilty of a crime I would denounce him as harshly as I do Bill Clinton. I simply have not heard enough to even consider this matter, and that it comes from a filthpot makes the matter even worse. >I can honestly say that it wouldnt matter to me who reported a murder. Say for example Jeffrey Dahmer exposed the local hero as a murderer (no, not OJ), then I would want to expose that murderer for what he truly is.< The circumstances here are quite different from those surrounding Barr. Flynt and his whore have a compelling motive to report a murder against Barr, and this motive likely has caused them to misrepresent the facts. Even so, should Dahmer report a murder, I would yet be compelled not to jump to the conclusion that he was telling the truth. Dahmer was a psychopath. I need evidence or at least well corroborated testimony before I begin to condemn Barr. >Of course this entire argument is moot if the republicans such as Barr really dont believe that abortion is murder and are just using this issue as a convenient tool to mobilize their constituency.< The argument is not insignificant to me despite the motives of Robert Barr. >And if a Dr or two gets killed in the crossfire, oh well.< Silly.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next