Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 174.01

-0.3%

Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gregg Powers who wrote (21380)	1/15/1999 5:05:00 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) of 152472

Gregg, that has to be plagiarism: "How do you fight an ethical battle with an unarmed man?" Are they really your words? That has me going round and round in circles and very amused. 11 cents a share extra is only $8m or so. Surely that isn't too much to ask from a brilliant quarter when all handsets sold flat out and therefore margins must have been extorquerationate. ASIC sales were through the roof by the look of overall handset sales. $8m is only $8 per extra handset sold if 1 million extra were sold by all cdmaOne handset producers. Mquarkce PS: You could put an ethically unarmed man in a tank full of hagfish. That would be ethical - many superior beings living at the expense of one dying [much like we eat wheat, eggs, fish, sheep and Maoris even used to eat people - those defeated in battle]. If he is unarmed, you should easily be able to toss him in. But putting armless people in a hagfish tank would be an ugly spectacle. [I suppose the meaning of 'superior' is questionable in this context and might simply mean - more powerful, lucky, cunning]

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next