Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Peter O'Brien who wrote (28253)	1/15/1999 6:29:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (2) of 67261

Just because Clinton may have been unfairly attacked in the past doesn't automatically* mean he is innocent of all charges against him... That logic is simply absurd!* Nope. The fact that Clinton has been unfairly attacked in the past only means that those who didn't complain then have no grounds whatsoever to whine now about the Hydes and the Barrs of the world coming under similar attacks. Just because somebody (like me) is critical of Clinton regarding these impeachment charges doesn't automatically mean that they must also be a religious-right Christian conservative.. That, too, is simply absurd! Nope. The fact that the vast majority of the lay people in this country (at one end of the "knowledge spectrum") and 900 constitutional scholars (at the other end of the spectrum) regard that the allegations, even if proven true, are not worthy of impeachment, means that people like you have nobody for company other than those religious right-wing nuts who wanted Clinton to be impeached the moment he became President.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next