I agree the news clarification was an unnecessary snafu that could have been prevented with better attention to the details involved in a PR. in fact, i wish DGIV had better PR help. However, I am not investing in DGIV for its PR. am investing in it for its ability to sign contracts in foreign countries.
The main thing is that DGIV still has the China deal. It is a joint venture with Teltek, a company with an established track record and a presence in many Asian countries. As DGIV delivers its end of the deal, it will get the reward. Perhaps because DGIV is an OTCBB company, its lawyers are being extraordinarily sensitive in its PR wording. In the final analysis, teltek would not have made the deal with DGIV if it were not certain DGIV can deliver. After all, since teltek has the licenses needed in these countries, it could choose any other IP telephony companies. YET IT CHOSE TO PARTNER WITH DGIV!!!! it is obvious that teltek believes DGIV will deliver!!!!
An important point to consider: teltek would not have taken the stock option at 1.5 if it did not think DGIV shares would not be worth much more than 1.5 in the future. Knowing the share price involved in the option, I actually feel even better about the deal. Mind you, i still wish we did not have to deal with the correction, but the facts of the deal still remained the same, with or without a PR correction.
teltek is in many other Asian countries. teltek now has DGIV shares , so it would be good for teltek to help DGIV succeed. By seeing that Teltek is in other Asian countries that need IP telephony, one can imagine DGIV being a presence in these countries through teltek in the future. The ability to expand its business through teltek is the key reason this deal is important for DGIV . It is important nOT in the immediate revenues, but in the revenues to come, IMO!!! |
