SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jim kelley who wrote (28336)1/16/1999 5:58:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
It's immaterial whether the judge had dismissed the suit later. If you tamper with witness resulting in their perjuring or if you perjure yourself, you are still breaking the law. With your logic, he would be within his right to pay witnesses or threaten them bodily harm to get them to perjure as long as the case was thrown out later.

He phrased the instructions to lie as questions to try to obscure their intent. Since each of those questions were falsehoods, they were in fact attempts to coordinate false testimony. He also had stated to the effect that they can't get caught if they all stick to the same story.

Court TV has already covered these before. People have been convicted for the above.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News