SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cirruslvr who wrote (46315)1/17/1999 1:11:00 AM
From: Brian Hutcheson  Read Replies (1) of 1571681
 
C L , re. were the process problems only with .35
On the .35 they could not ramp the volume while maintaining clock speed increase . They had problems obtaining 266mhz parts and any kind of volume even on lower clock 200mhz.
They started .25 at the beginning of '98 and produced over 10 million
K6 with speeds up to 400mhz .
So the .25 process has been much more successful .
They have obviously had some problems as the latest CC indicates but if the K6-3 and K7 are initially being produced on .25 or .22 they should have a good ramp as the .25 is a proven process for them .
The K7 on .22 IMO should be better than Intel's offerings
Brian
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext