SSRIF Silver Standard Resources Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SSRIF Silver Standard Resources

SSO 116.71

+0.5%

Oct 31 4:00 PM EDT

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: philv who wrote (316)	1/18/1999 1:11:00 PM
From: Squidman	Read Replies (1) of 403

<< all very positive. Now if the POS will co-operate.......>> Well it's certainly very positive, but it looks like we want the POG to co-operate, not POS. Out of that 1404 g/t silver equivalent intersection 1091 g/t is from Gold!! I've frequently seen it presented the other way around, but when gold intersections of up to 40 g/t over 5 m are discussed in terms of "silver-equivalent per tonne" and not mentioned in the text of the release then I know we must be pretty near a bottom for gold. Then again, with a name like Silver Standard - maybe they're just embarrassed by this other Stuff in their cores. Squidman

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next